www.gemmahayes.net
Gemma will appear at Liam Clancy's shows in Dublin at the end of May and will also record for the Late, Late show on may 22nd
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
LauraB2002 |
News and stuff |
Lead | |
|
www.gemmahayes.net
|
|||
jessika2001 |
|||
|
Who's going?
|
|||
pianoman |
|||
|
I wouldn't wish to deprive a proper Liam Clancy fan of a seat. I bought his recent live DVD anyway.
thanks for the news, anyway
one two three four
|
|||
jessika2001 |
|||
|
Well she won't sing any of her music at all in May. For the Liam Clancy's shows she will sing on background vocals on one of his songs.
Last Edited By: jessika2001
04/16/09 07:25:53.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
david360 |
|||
|
Not a hope so, was looking at a Liam Clancy dvd at lunchtime there. I know some of his songs but like Pianoman it would abhore me to deprive a real fan of a
seat.
|
|||
jessika2001 |
|||
|
To Laura, how do you know about Galway and the Late Late show? are you sure about that?
|
|||
glenn rossington |
|||
jessika2001 wrote: Are you questionning our Illustrious leader's sources Jessika? Haha
Your Pal, Glenn :D X
|
|||
pianoman |
|||
|
I'm only here for Laura's witty retorts, really
no pressure!
one two three four
|
|||
jessika2001 |
|||
|
Lol Glen!
Well it's important because from Gemma herself, she won't play any of her music in May. it's important to not give wrong information because people will come and believe this is her full show and will be disappointed. |
|||
pianoman |
|||
|
I thought you said a while back that she'd be doing an Irish tour in May
one two three four
|
|||
jennisaurusrex |
|||
|
No offense, Jessika, because I know you have the best intentions (and forgive me, Laura, as I know you can defend yourself), but it's pretty inappropriate
to imply that Laura (who is, after all, the owner of this site) doesn't know what she's talking about when it comes to Gemma. Whatever contact you do
or do not have with Gemma, Laura has run this site for many years and has an established relationship with the appropriate people to give out info. To assume
that whatever info you've gotten is complete and the final word is incorrect and a bit disrespectful.
I know that seems kinda heavy (as I saw others kinda jokingly prodding you about it), but I've seen several such comments lately and it comes off as a little aggressive, Jessika. As I said, I know you're a big fan and are doing a lot to get the word out, but coming here and insisting that your conversations with Gemma or whoever are the top word is a little bit inappropriate, I think. That being said, it's not your fault that people were cut about the LA gig-- I'm sure many people showed up because they know Gemma's music and they don't frequent this board at all, so don't give so much weight to it. I would say a good majority of fans of Gemma's don't frequent this forum, so any responsibility you bear for any of that is minimal at best. Carry on, lads!
Last Edited By: jennisaurusrex
04/18/09 07:44:23.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
LauraB2002 |
|||
jessika2001 wrote: Well that accusation isnt at all patronising is it?Gemma told me herself actually but you can check with her if my word is doubted Despite now doing this site for many years, and I mean in different guises this site has been around since early 2001, I am beginning to lose the will. The one-upmanship is frankly tiring and I dont think I'll be persisting with the site any longer which is a shame as Ive always put 100% effort into all news and content which I have built this site upon. Thanks to everyone who has come here and supported the forum and site but I think it's actually run it's course
Last Edited By: LauraB2002
04/18/09 10:25:43.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Cathy 176 |
=[ | ||
|
That's a shame.
I like the site.. but I understand where you're coming from. And it is indeed very tiring. |
|||
jessika2001 |
|||
|
To Jenni, sorry but I don't know what you're talking about, we don't even know each other and I'm far from being aggressive. I'm sad, this
is going nowhere.
I was just asking because yeah I didn't get the same info. and I don't care. I didn't say anything about all the work Laura has done, I don't know why you put this on a table. I respect everything, everyone. don't get me wrong but...yeah, I think I have nothing to do. you're free to express yourself. I don't know what to say about the future end of this website and forum, I'm terribly sad. Thanks Laura for everything you have done here.
Last Edited By: jessika2001
04/18/09 14:48:44.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
jennisaurusrex |
|||
|
I don't want to prolong this, Jessika, but re-read some of your messages from the past week, and I think you might re-think that. Your tone came off as
pretty condescending. I'm sure I wasn't the only one to notice it, but I was the first to mention it aloud. As I said in my previous post, I'm not
attacking you, but I think you ought to think before you type-- even if we don't mean things a certain way, perception is greater than reality in a lot of
senses.
Anyhow, L-- if you give this whole mess up, we need to have a little offshoot someplace! You know we love you. |
|||
jessika2001 |
|||
|
sorry again, it feels weird, I'm not that kind of person but you know...we don't see ourselves like others can see, maybe you're right. And maybe
I'm misread because it's really painful for me to express myself with the right words because I don't have an "english or US" mind!
I feel sorry for the future end of it all, I'll miss all of people's writings. The little offshoot you want...a new forum? I can do something like that as I run one for almost 8 years (it was about The Corrs but is now closed for similar reasons Laura has mentioned). I'll need all kind of help & ideas. I wish, if people are agree, to not see and end but a following thing...we can't stop the wheel, please. |
|||
Nick |
|||
|
I'm sorry, but this seems like an incredible overreaction to me. Personally, I didn't read any condescending tone or one-upmanship (never mind
aggression or disrespect), it just looked like one person had some information and another person had information they thought contradicted that, so a question
was asked to seek clarification on it.
And even if there was, a mere condescending tone is hardly reason to throw in a well-liked forum and years of effort! I'm sure we're humble enough to recognise that none of us are infallible. I think everyone needs to chill and remember the innate ambiguity of internet posts, especially when a non-native language is involved, and not forget that everyone is here for the same reason. This is such a small yet essential place that we all benefit from, why spoil that when there's no need to pick it apart for politics and principle.
Last Edited By: Nick
04/19/09 01:23:34.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
LauraB2002 |
|||
Nick wrote:Im sure you can appreciate that after a number of years doing this that I wouldnt make a rash decision about the future of the site - this has come about after a few months which to be honest have grated on me with certain comments made both here and behind the scenes. I'm afraid I'm a person who believes very much in standing by their own principles. As I said on the news page, I do appreciate everyone coming here and the support over the years |
|||
pianoman |
|||
jessika2001 wrote:that's plausible in itself, but Laura wouldn't put it in the news section if she wasn't sure it was matter of fact, I'm sure. To question her news item is a bit of an insult to Laura, not least considering the fact that you've posted a fair bit of news yourself lately and (at least) appear to consider yourself the authority on all things Gemma now. You could have asked Laura in private or even asked Gemma, no? Like Jenni said, maybe think before you talk. And I understand English isn't your first language, although your English isn't too bad at all. I don't think the site should be shut down; it's not only one of the few, but, clearly, the best resource for Gemma (and way better than most fansites for any act) online, and a lot of work has gone into it. Gemma's fortunate to have had this site backing her all these years, many of them with little activity from Gemma herself. But it's obviously Laura's decision, if she wants to close it. I just wanna know where Kevin Shields is gonna search now, when he needs to find out where Gemma's gig is on!
one two three four
|
|||
jessika2001 |
|||
|
This is going very far...for nothing, I really don't get such messages like "you consider yourself the authority on all things Gemma"....I would
say: Hello "pianoman", nice to meet you, my name's jessy, I'm a member in here since months and I'm just posting news when I find them or
get them, that's all.
I don't know why you're seeing things that far. Thanks Nick. You see things just right. I'm sorry, I think you're right "pianoman", I could just have sent Laura a PM. It was a mistake and if it's still viewed as an insult...well it's up to you, because it's just not. Now please stop making false interpretation, this is really so easy to do. I don't judge anybody and I don't understand why people have to say "jessy, you're like that, you're insulting"...LOL!! Hello!! if you know me, I think you'll say that I'm really too nice, I insist with the word "too" because sometimes it's not good for me. Anyway, if we have to talk about news & stuff again for weeks again in that thread, let's do it. I know that Gemma will play some other shows but I just can't give any info if it's not totally confirmed too. When it will be, I'll come back again here. Now, who will be in Dublin on May 27 to 29? I'll be there with friends, maybe I could meet some of you, we could chat and talk about music? (if you like, send me a PM).
Last Edited By: jessika2001
04/19/09 08:15:34.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
Nick |
|||
|
Of course it's absolutely your decision what you do with the site, Laura, but I can't help feeling like it would be such a shame to deprive the
internet, Gemma's fanbase and arguably Gemma herself of such a resource as this, over what appears to be no more than a little misunderstanding or two
between a couple of intelligent adults.
I appreciate that I am not privy to the full picture but surely there's a better resolution that would not harm the reason we came here in the first place. Particularly when it's perfectly evident that there was zero intent to cause harm. |
|||